107 pages • 3 hours read
J. F. BierleinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In nearly every creation myth, before the world, before the animals, before humans, nothing exists but some variation of “chaos,” “watery chaos,” or “watery darkness.” Out of this chaos, the “Creator” molds and shapes the world and its inhabitants. In a stunning parallel to evolutionary biology, these myths paralleled what Darwin and later biologists would describe in their theory of evolution, a primordial soup covering much of the Earth from which all life eventually evolved. The transition from chaos to order represents the human need for community and society and may also follow the transition from early, pre-civilized Homo sapiens to more modern, socialized humans. Water itself is also a potent symbol, representing both power and chaos (the many flood myths) but also fertility and birth (and even rebirth for those cultures whose myths describe a creation/destruction/recreation cycle). These creation stories perfectly exemplify the way in which myth conveys a deep, psychic truth centuries before science quantifies that same truth with data.
Early humans saw in the world around them repeated patterns: the seasons, the rising and setting sun, the movement of the stars and the tides. Without the science to understand these patterns, they mythologized them, even extrapolating them into an epic, cosmic cycle of creation and destruction. The Indian myth of Rudra speaks of this cycle repeating itself an infinite number of times: “[O]nly the Eternal knows how many times this has taken place” (237). The Tibetan myth of Maitreya speaks of a period of drought, followed by abundance and the eventual Enlightenment of all people. The Norse myth of Ragnarok foretells the “twilight of the gods” when Loki breaks loose from his bonds and wreaks havoc upon the earth and the gods will have to fight for survival (246). At the end of this apocalypse, however, the “eternal God” will create a new earth. Cycles are predictable, a soothing regularity for early humans thrust into a violent world of harsh nature and deadly predators. It makes sense that those cycles would be enshrined in myth.
Death may be the most terrifying reality faced by any human being. It’s the ultimate end (as far as we know). To cheat death—or to at least be given a second chance—is too tempting an offer to pass up. In many of these cultural myths of the apocalypse, humans are reborn into either eternal paradise or eternal damnation. The motif of rebirth occurs in numerous cultures: Judeo-Christian, Islamic, and the reincarnation myths of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Gnosticism. The latter three diverge from the Abrahamic traditions, however. In Hinduism, rebirth is part of the process of spiritual growth, a steady path toward Enlightenment and Nirvana. Islam and Judeo-Christianity depict a far more draconian outcome. Both have a final judgment component attached: A heavenly adjudicator will judge each person’s life and character; the righteous will be saved, and the wicked will be punished eternally. This fear of judgment also serves the purpose of moral guidance, holding society to a standard of conformity and obedience. The common thread among such stories—whether in mythology or in literature—is twofold: the human desire to transcend death, but also, on a mythic level, rebirth as a symbol of just another step on the hero’s journey toward self-realization.
Love as a motif in myth and literature never grows old. From the earliest Greek myths of Cupid and Psyche to the story of Coniraya and Cavillaca (Peru) and the Algonquin tale of Algon and the Sky-Girl and continuing to the contemporary rom-com genre in film, love is the enduring emotion, the one that drives people to madness and suicide (Romeo and Juliet). It seizes people—particularly young people in the grip of adolescence and hormonal turmoil—sending them to the extreme edge of passion and recklessness. Anger is perhaps the only emotion that has the same effect, although love has its own unique rewards with which anger cannot compete. Love has the unique and transcendent ability to give meaning to a meaningless world; “love becomes the ultimate human answer to the ultimate human question” (136). Whether romantic love or love and compassion toward humanity, all cultures have not only recognized its significance but embedded it in the fabric of their social being through myth.
Myth by nature sees the world in dualities: good and evil, right and wrong, black and white. People are judged to be righteous or wicked; even the gods are often depicted as having humanity’s best interests at heart or scheming to deceive them. Myth doesn’t have time for the subtleties of relativism or behavioral psychology. If myth is to function as intended, it cannot leave room for equivocation or second-guessing. A hero is noble (until, of course, his tragic flaw dooms him in a self-fulfilling prophecy), but even the tragic hero’s fate is due more to the capriciousness of the gods than to his own psychological disfunction. Myths are necessarily reductive. To complicate them with nuance is to defeat their purpose. If myths are meant to help us understand our world and to impart moral lessons, those functions are best served by simple stories that are not bogged down by self-doubt. Even today, when science answers many questions about the cosmos and human behavior, the complexity of those answers is far less emotionally satisfying than the straightforward tales of Theseus and Siegfried or of the African myth of the three people and the statue.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: